Football Top Ten Rankings

Final RPI Class 2A thru 8 Man and Final Playoff Projections

Class 2A RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation

Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.

Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)

  • The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
  • A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
  • Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
  • Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.

RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)

The formula is (.25*WP)+(.50*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)

Rank Team RPI Record WP OWP OOWP SOS
1 La Junta .689 9-0 1.000 .618 .523 3
2 Resurrection Christian .652 9-0 1.000 .542 .527 9
3 Classical Academy .625 8-1 .922 .516 .548 14
4 Sterling .622 6-3 .667 .663 .496 1
5 Bayfield .608 7-2 .811 .556 .509 8
6 Kent Denver .597 8-1 .906 .488 .508 20
7 Delta .587 6-3 .667 .595 .493 4
8 D’Evelyn .574 7-2 .794 .506 .492 18
9 Weld Central .569 8-1 .922 .411 .534 29
10 Manitou Springs .564 6-3 .667 .532 .528 13
11 Florence .557 5-4 .572 .560 .537 5
12 Faith Christian .555 6-3 .667 .546 .465 16
13 University .554 6-3 .667 .542 .467 17
14 Platte Valley .551 4-5 .444 .631 .499 2
15 Basalt .539 7-2 .794 .447 .468 28
16 Alamosa .535 5-4 .541 .534 .531 12
17 Eaton .526 6-3 .667 .443 .553 22
18 Gunnison .526 4-5 .444 .535 .540 10
19 Machebeuf .508 7-2 .778 .379 .497 38
20 Valley .496 5-4 .556 .463 .507 23

Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off of current league standings and RPI rankings

League Champions

Kent Denver-Colorado League

Faith Christian-Flatirons

Bayfield-Intermountain

Sterling-Patriot East

Resurrection Christian-Patriot West

La Junta-Tri Peaks

Basalt-Western Slope

At Large Berths

Classical Academy, Delta, D’Evelyn, Weld Central, Manitou Springs, Florence, University, Platte Valley, Alamosa

First Four Out

 

Eaton

Gunnison

Machebeuf

Valley

First Round Matchups

  1. La Junta vs 16. Alamosa
  2. Resurrection Chr. vs 15. Platte Valley
  3. Classical Academy vs 14. University
  4. Sterling vs 13. Florence
  5. Bayfield vs 12. Weld Central
  6. Kent Denver vs 11. Manitou Springs
  7. Faith Christian vs 10. D’Evelyn
  8. Basalt vs 9. Delta

 

Class 1A RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation

Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.

Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)

  • The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
  • A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
  • Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
  • Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.

RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)

The formula is (.25*WP)+(.50*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)

Rank Team RPI Record WP OWP OOWP SOS
1 Meeker .699 9-0 1.017 .618 .544 2
2 Bennett .693 8-1 .889 .684 .518 1
3 Strasburg .662 9-0 .1.017 .558 .519 15
4 Paonia .662 8-1 .922 .586 .555 4
5 Platte Canyon .650 8-1 .906 .584 .528 8
6 Cedaredge .623 7-2 .811 .560 .561 10
7 Limon .606 6-3 .667 .629 .502 3
8 Peyton .599 9-0 1.000 .435 .529 32
9 Burlington .596 7-2 .794 .514 .562 18
10 Center .591 6-3 .667 .600 .498 7
11 Buena Vista .568 6-3 .700 .530 .512 20
12 Grand Valley .567 5-4 .589 .574 .533 9
13 Crowley County .563 7-1 .875 .438 .505 34
14 Highland .560 6-3 .667 .546 .485 19
15 Monte Vista .554 5-4 .572 .566 .512 13
16 Ellicott .544828 5-4 .556 .572 .481 16
17 Olathe .544694 4-5 .478 .588 .525 6
18 Clear Creek .541 7-2 .814 .409 .534 36
19 Centauri .535 6-3 .683 .471 .515 29
20 Rye .524 4-5 .444 .566 .520 11

Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off of current league standings and RPI rankings

League Champions

Bennett-Foothills

Burlington-North Central

Strasburg-Northern

Crowley County-Santa Fe

Monte Vista-Southern Peaks

Peyton-Tri-Peaks

Meeker-Western Slope

At Large Berths

Paonia, Platte Canyon, Cedaredge, Limon, Center, Buena Vista, Grand Valley, Highland, Ellicott

First Four Out

 

Olathe, Clear Creek, Centauri, Rye

First Round Matchups

  1. Meeker vs 16. Ellicott
  2. Strasburg vs 15. Grand Valley
  3. Bennett vs 14.Highland
  4. Paonia vs 13. Buena Vista
  5. Peytonvs 12. Center
  6. Burlington vs 11. Cedaredge
  7. Crowley Countyvs 10. Limon
  8. Monte Vista vs 9. Platte Canyon

 

Class 8 Man RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation

Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.

Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)

  • The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
  • A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
  • Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
  • Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.

RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)

The formula is (.25*WP)+(.50*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)

Rank Team RPI Record WP OWP OOWP SOS
1 Akron .659 7-2 .778 .643 .573 2
2 Dayspring Christian .644 6-3 .667 .669 .574 1
3 Merino .629 7-2 .794 .588 .548 4
4 West Grand .628 8-1 .906 .563 .482 7
5 Sedgwick County .627 8-1 .906 .516 .574 8
6 Sargent .612 9-0 1.000 .472 .504 20
7 Pikes Peak Christian .591 8-1 .889 .500 .478 17
8 Hoehne .580 7-2 .778 .524 .496 12
9 Granada .573 7-2 .778 .502 .513 13
10 Norwood .570 7-1 .875 .463 .482 27
11 McCLave .556 6-3 .667 .530 .499 10
12 Haxtun .554 5-4 .556 .554 .556 5
13 Plateau Valley .535 5-3 .625 .514 .488 14
14 Soroco .532 6-3 .667 .468 .525 18
15 Holly .524 6-2 .750 .427 .493 33
16 Mancos .516 5-4 .556 .514 .484 15
17 Simla .499 4-5 .444 .528 .499 11
18 Fowler .498 5-4 .556 .476 .486 21
19 Sanford .495 3-6 .333 .583 .481 6
20 Gilpin County .495 5-4 .556 .447 .532 25

Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off of current league standings and RPI rankings

League Champions

 

Pikes Peak Christian-Central

West Grand-Northwest

Sedgwick County-Plains

Granada-Southeast

Hoehne-Southern

Sargent-Southwest

At Large Berths

Akron, Dayspring, Merino, Norwood, McClave, Haxtun, Plateau Valley, Soroco, Holly, Mancos

First Four Out

 

Simla

Fowler

Sanford

Gilpin County

First Round Matchups

  1. Sedgwick County vs 16. Mancos
  2. Akron vs 15. Holly
  3. Sargent vs 14.Soroco
  4. Merino vs 13. Plateau Valley
  5. West Grand vs 12. McClave
  6. Pikes Peak Christian vs 11. Haxtun
  7. Hoehne vs 10. Norwood
  8. Granada vs 9. Dayspring Christian