
CHSAA RPI Rankings and If the Playoffs Started Today
Class 2A RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation
http://chsaanow.com/rpi/football/ Official CHSAA Webpage for RPI
Of Course this is not the final RPI and things could still change before the seeding committee tomorrow morning.
(RPI pulled on 9:00pm 10/28/2017)
Note: Win! Take care of business and you will get in!
Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket and the league champion also gets an automatic berth. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.
Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)
- The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
- A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
- Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
- Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.375*WP)+(.375*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record | WP | OWP | OOWP |
| 1 | Platte Valley | .736 | 9-0 | 1.017 | .582 | .545 |
| 2 | Kent Denver | .713 | 9-0 | 1.017 | .546 | .507 |
| 3 | Bayfield | .698 | 9-0 | 1.050 | .459 | .529 |
| 4 | La Junta | .681 | 8-1 | .889 | .578 | .522 |
| 5 | Classical Academy | .671 | 8-1 | .922 | .497 | .554 |
| 6 | Sterling | .668 | 7-2 | .778 | .644 | .539 |
| 7 | Basalt | .647 | 8-1 | .906 | .497 | .485 |
| 8 | Faith Christian | .635 | 8-1 | .889 | .473 | .496 |
| 9 | Machebeuf | .618 | 8-1 | .889 | .423 | .503 |
| 10 | Eaton | .615 | 7-2 | .778 | .500 | .543 |
| 11 | Salida | .614 | 7-2 | .794 | .471 | .558 |
| 12 | Aspen | .613 | 8-1 | .874 | .437 | .486 |
| 13 | Pagosa Springs | .595 | 6-3 | 638 | .608 | .513 |
| 14 | Elizabeth | .561 | 6-3 | .700 | .460 | .503 |
| 15 | Resurrection Christian | .560 | 5-4 | .556 | .599 | .508 |
| 16 | D’Evelyn | .543 | 4-4 | .519 | .601 | .488 |
| 17 | Coal Ridge | .533 | 5-4 | .543 | .554 | .484 |
| 18 | Valley | .524 | 5-4 | .556 | .504 | .505 |
| 19 | Brush | .521 | 4-5 | .444 | .600 | .519 |
| 20 | Delta | .517 | 4-5 | .444 | .596 | .505 |
Notes: I know D’Evelyn still has not updated their final game but with their final win they should still be int the playoffs by .005 unless their OOWP changes drastically.
Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off RPI rankings & League Champions
League Champions
Kent Denver-Colorado League
Faith Christian-Flatirons
Bayfield- Intermountain
Platte Valley-Patriot East
Eaton- Patriot West
La Junta- Tri Peaks
Basalt- Western Slope
At Large Berths
Classical Academy, Sterling, Machebeuf, Salida, Aspen, Pagosa Springs, Elizabeth, Resurrection Christian, D’Evelyn
First Four Out
Coal Ridge, Valley, Brush, Delta
First Round Matchups
- Platte Valley vs 16. D’Evelyn
- Kent Denver vs 15. Resurrection Christian
- Bayfield vs 14. Elizabeth
- La Junta vs 13. Pagosa Springs
- Classical Academy vs 12. Aspen
- Basalt vs 11. Salida
- Faith Christian 10. Machebeuf
- Eaton vs 9. Sterling
Class 1A RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation
Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.
Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)
- The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
- A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
- Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
- Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.375*WP)+(.375*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record | WP | OWP | OOWP |
| 1 | Bennett | .757 | 9-0 | 1.000 | .682 | .504 |
| 2 | Meeker | .738 | 9-0 | 1.017 | .588 | .543 |
| 3 | Centauri | .703 | 9-0 | 1.017 | .519 | .509 |
| 4 | Strasburg | .692 | 8-1 | .906 | .599 | .511 |
| 5 | Clear Creek | .633125 | 8-1 | .925 | .424 | .509 |
| 6 | Limon | .633000 | 7-2 | .778 | .574 | .504 |
| 7 | Burlington | .630 | 7-2 | .794 | .514 | .559 |
| 8 | Paonia | .618 | 7-2 | .811 | .479 | .535 |
| 9 | Crowley County | .602 | 7-1 | .875 | .409 | .481 |
| 10 | Peyton | .601 | 8-1 | .889 | .377 | .503 |
| 11 | Platte Canyon | .597 | 6-2 | .769 | .481 | .515 |
| 12 | Monte Vista | .595 | 6-3 | .667 | .588 | .498 |
| 13 | Highland | .577 | 6-3 | .667 | .546 | .489 |
| 14 | Cornerstone Christian | .561 | 6-3 | .667 | .474 | .533 |
| 15 | Wray | .531 | 5-4 | .556 | .502 | .537 |
| 16 | Colorado Springs Christian | .523 | 6-3 | .683 | .401 | .467 |
| 17 | Hotchkiss | .522 | 4-4 | .500 | .401 | .517 |
| 18 | Cedaredge | .511 | 4-5 | .461 | .546 | .532 |
| 19 | Olathe | .504 | 4-5 | .478 | .505 | .540 |
| 20 | Buena Vista | .502 | 4-5 | .444 | .586 | .461 |
Notes: When Hotchkiss lost to Cedaredge in the final game it locked Wray into the playoffs and also gave Colorado Springs Christian the #16 spot. The final spot is separated by .001 which is insane.
Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off RPI Rankings and League Champions
League Champions(*=Clinched)
Bennett-Foothills
Burlington-North Central
Strasburg-Northern
Crowley County-Santa Fe
Centauri-Southern Peaks
Peyton-Tri Peaks
Meeker-Western Slope
At Large Berths
Clear Creek, Limon, Paonia, Platte Canyon, Monte Vista, Highland, Cornerstone Christian, Wray, Colorado Springs Christian
First Four Out
Hotchkiss, Cedaredge, Olathe, Buena Vista
First Round Matchups
- Bennett vs 16. Colorado Springs Christian
- Meeker vs 15. Wray
- Centauri vs 14. Cornerstone Christian
- Strasburg vs 13. Highland
- Clear Creek vs 12. Monte Vista
- Burlington vs 11. Platte Canyon
- Crowley County vs 10. Paonia
- Peyton vs 9. Limon
Class 8 Man RPI Rankings and Playoff Situation
Playoffs (Straight from Chsaanow.com): The Top 16 teams in the classification based on the final RPI rankings will be placed into the post-season bracket. If a conference champion is not rankings in the top 16 based on RPI rankings they will replace the lowest ranked team that is not a conference champion in the top 16.
Seeding Criteria (once qualifiers are determined)
- The following criteria will be taken into consideration when seeding bracket, in no particular order: geography, RPI, common opponents, and head to head competition
- A conference champion in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be a top 8 seed and will host a first round game
- Aa conference champion no ranked in the top 16 of the final RPI rankings will be placed in the bracket but will not be guaranteed a top 8 seed and will not be guaranteed to host a first round game.
- Conference opponents will not be paired against one another in the first round.
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.375*WP)+(.375*OWP)+(.25*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record | WP | OWP | OOWP |
| 1 | Sedgwick County | .746 | 9-0 | 1.019 | .578 | .589 |
| 2 | Merino | .719 | 8-1 | .906 | .655 | .537 |
| 3 | West Grand | .692 | 9-0 | 1.000 | .486 | .537 |
| 4 | Hoehne | .668 | 8-1 | .889 | .562 | .495 |
| 5 | Gilpin County | .624 | 7-2 | .778 | .512 | .562 |
| 6 | Fowler | .608 | 8-1 | .889 | .397 | .505 |
| 7 | Holly | .604 | 7-1 | .875 | .422 | .470 |
| 8 | Rocky Mountain Lutheran | .590 | 7-2 | .778 | .469 | .491 |
| 9 | Mancos | .588 | 7-2 | .778 | .454 | .505 |
| 10 | Sargent | .587 | 6-3 | .667 | .579 | .482 |
| 11 | Haxtun | .584 | 6-3 | .667 | .520 | .555 |
| 12 | Soroco | .582 | 6-3 | .667 | .513 | .559 |
| 13 | Norwood | .574 | 5-2 | .714 | .500 | .475 |
| 14 | Springfield | .550 | 6-3 | .667 | .476 | .486 |
| 15 | McClave | .548 | 6-3 | .667 | .472 | .485 |
| 16 | Caliche | .547 | 4-5 | .444 | .643 | .555 |
| 17 | South Park | .544 | 6-3 | .667 | .481 | .456 |
| 18 | Dayspring Christian | .538 | 4-5 | .444 | .627 | .545 |
| 19 | Del Norte | .508 | 6-3 | .667 | .342 | .518 |
| 20 | Hayden | .507 | 5-4 | .556 | .464 | .499 |
Notes: Like I had mentioned in the 8-Man breakdown. The two league title shook everything up in the RPI. Sargent smashed Mancos and Springfield made quick work of McClave. Springfields win moved South Park out of the Top 16 and also Caliche beating Akron got Caliche .003 over South Park for the Final Spot. If McClave would have won South Park gets into the playoffs. What a crazy year for 8-Man and I cannot wait for the playoffs.
Who is in and Who is out for the Playoffs based off current league standings and RPI rankings
League Champions (*=Clinched)
Rocky Mountain Lutheran-Central
West Grand-Northwest
Sedgwick County-Plains
Springfield-Southeast
Hoehne-Southern
Sargent-Southwest
At Large Berths
Merino, Gilpin County, Fowler, Holly, Mancos, Haxtun, Soroco, Norwood, McClave, Caliche
First Four Out
South Park, Dayspring Christian, Del Norte, Hayden
First Round Matchups
- Sedgwick County vs 16. McClave
- Merino vs 15. Norwood
- West Grand vs 14. Caliche
- Hoehne vs 13. Soroco
- Gilpin County vs 12. Haxtun
- Rocky Mountain Lutheran vs 11. Mancos
- Sargent vs 10. Holly
- Springfield vs 9. Fowler

Sincerely doubt that Salida will be #10 seed in front of Machebeuf.
#1 – Salida to Basalt is closer than Machebeuf to Basalt
#2 – Machebeuf only lost to undefeated Kent Denver
#3 – Salida lost to CA and LaJunta (who Kent Denver beat)
#4 – Machebeuf beat Elizabeth at Elizabeth by nearly the same margin as LaJunta beat Elizabeth at Elizabeth
LikeLike
Yes sir you are correct. I believe that the RPI was misread and Machebeuf should be ahead of Salida. It is updated with Machebeuf ahead of Salida. Thanks for catching that.
LikeLike
No worries; who knows what the committee will do!
LikeLike
I agree but solid points and Machebeuf is higher in the RPI than Salida. I am excited to see the bracket in a few hours.
LikeLike