CHSAA Official RPI Week 5 Football Rankings (Class 2A thru 6-Man)
With just 6 games in the season the RPI numbers will change drastically from week to week. Already we see a team like Centauri go from #6 to #14. Things are going to change a ton for the next couple weeks. Remember the RPI is just 1 of the 4 polls used to help select the teams that make the playoffs. In Class The Coaches Poll, MaxPreps, and Erik Packards Poll are also used to create the CHSAA Seeding Index.
Class 2A RPI Rankings
http://chsaanow.com/rpi/football/ Official CHSAA Webpage for RPI (All teams at the link)
(RPI updated on 8:39am 11/1/2020)
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.30*WP)+(.40*OWP)+(.30*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record |
| 1 | Sterling | .741 | 4-0 |
| 2 | Delta | .651 | 4-0 |
| 3 | Resurrection Christian | .623 | 4-0 |
| 4 | Moffat County | .589 | 2-1 |
| 5 | Pagosa Springs | .585 | 4-0 |
| 6 | Platte Valley | .564 | 3-1 |
| 7 | Lamar | .559 | 3-1 |
| 8 | University | .556 | 2-2 |
| 9 | Valley | .538 | 2-2 |
| 10 | Eaton | .528 | 3-1 |
| 11 | Severance | .527 | 3-1 |
| 12 | Bayfield | .479 | 0-4 |
| 13 | Berthoud | .471 | 2-1 |
| 14 | Woodland Park | .470 | 2-2 |
| 15 | La Junta | .447 | 2-2 |
| 16 | D’Evelyn | .440 | 2-2 |
| 17 | Brush | .429 | 1-3 |
| 18 | Englewood | .403 | 0-3 |
| 19 | Elizabeth | .376 | 1-3 |
| 20 | Arvada | .367 | 0-3 |
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.30*WP)+(.40*OWP)+(.30*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record |
| 1 | Limon | .747 | 4-0 |
| 2 | Meeker | .721 | 3-1 |
| 3 | Florence | .682 | 4-0 |
| 4 | Wray | .666 | 4-0 |
| 5 | Strasburg | .660 | 4-0 |
| 6 | Holyoke | .654 | 2-1 |
| 7 | Hotchkiss | .650 | 4-0 |
| 8 | Centauri | .585 | 4-0 |
| 9 | C.S Christian | .580 | 3-1 |
| 10 | Peyton | .574 | 3-1 |
| 11 | Highland | .571 | 2-2 |
| 12 | Gunnison | .551 | 2-2 |
| 13 | Yuma | .545 | 2-2 |
| 14 | Wiggins | .538 | 1-3 |
| 15 | Platte Canyon | .536 | 2-2 |
| 16 | Cedaredge | .504 | 2-2 |
| 17 | Ignacio | .499 | 2-1 |
| 18 | Banning Lewis | .488 | 2-2 |
| 19 | Monte Vista | .484 | 3-1 |
| 20 | Bennett | .433 | 1-2 |
8-Man RPI Rankings
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.30*WP)+(.40*OWP)+(.30*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record |
| 1 | Holy | .677 | 2-0 |
| 2 | Sanford | .674 | 4-0 |
| 3 | Sedgwick County | .6402 | 3-0 |
| 4 | Pikes Peak Christian | .6395 | 3-1 |
| 5 | Simla | .634 | 3-1 |
| 6 | Rangely | .6197 | 4-0 |
| 7 | Swink | .6197 | 3-1 |
| 8 | Dove Creek | .616 | 3-1 |
| 9 | Merino | .614 | 4-0 |
| 10 | Crowley County | .613 | 2-0 |
| 11 | Mancos | .610 | 4-0 |
| 12 | Calhan | .544 | 1-2 |
| 13 | West Grand | .535 | 2-1 |
| 14 | Fowler | .529 | 4-0 |
| 15 | Norwood | .528 | 1-2 |
| 16 | Dolores Huerta | .521 | 2-2 |
| 17 | Haxtun | .518 | 1-3 |
| 18 | Byers | .511 | 2-1 |
| 19 | Vail Christian | .493 | 2-1 |
| 20 | Akron | .486 | 1-2 |
6-Man RPI Rankings
RPI Rankings (Official Rankings via Chsaanow.com)
The formula is (.30*WP)+(.40*OWP)+(.30*OOWP)
| Rank | Team | RPI | Record |
| 1 | Cheyenne Wells | .806 | 4-0 |
| 2 | Fleming | .763 | 4-0 |
| 3 | Stratton/Liberty | .742 | 3-0 |
| 4 | Prairie | .712 | 3-1 |
| 5 | Granada | .650 | 4-0 |
| 6 | Mountain Valley | .633 | 2-0 |
| 7 | Genoa-Hugo | .628 | 2-2 |
| 8 | Eads | .614 | 3-1 |
| 9 | Kit Carson | .589 | 2-1 |
| 10 | Briggsdale | .549 | 2-1 |
| 11 | Idalia | .542 | 1-2 |
| 12 | Cheraw | .540 | 3-1 |
| 13 | Hanover | .534 | 2-2 |
| 14 | Sierra Grande | .506 | 3-1 |
| 15 | Peetz | .494 | 2-2 |
| 16 | North Park | .485 | 2-2 |
| 17 | Hi-Plains | .475 | 1-1 |
| 18 | Arickaree/Woodlin | .463 | 2-2 |
| 19 | Walsh | .454 | 1-3 |
| 20 | La Veta | .440 | 1-3 |
